References

 
 

Table of Contents

   

Abbey, A.  (1982).  Sex differences in attributions of friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness?  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.

 

Abbey, A.  (1987).  Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents.  Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 173-194.

 

Abbey, A.  (1991).  Misperceptions as an antecedent of acquaintance rape: A consequence of ambiguity in communication between women and men.  In A. Parrot & L. Bechofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 96-111).  New York: Wiley.

 

Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Harnish, R. J.  (1987).  The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently?  Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(2), 108-126.

 

Abbey, A., & Melby, C.  (1986).  The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent.  Sex Roles, 15(5/6), 283-298.

 

Adams, C. J.  (1990/1994).  The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory.  New York: Continuum.

 

Agar, M. H.  (1980).  The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography.  New York: Academic Press.

 

Agar, M. H., & MacDonald, J.  (1995).  Focus groups and ethnography.  Human Organization,      54(1), 78-86.

 

Albrecht, T. L., Johnson, G. M., & Walther, J. B.  (1993).  Understanding communication processes in focus groups.  In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups (pp. 51-64).  Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Barrett, K.  (1982, September).  Date rape: A campus epidemic?  Ms., p. 48.

 

Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M.  (1996).  Relating: Dialogues & dialectics.  New York: Guilford Press.

 

Beneke, T.  (1982/1998).  Men on rape.  In M. S. Kimmel & M. A. Messner, Men’s Lives (4th Ed.) (pp. 437-443).  Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Berg, B. L.  (1998).  Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.  Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Bernard, H. R.  (2000).  Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., Sailer, L., & Kroenfeld, D.  (1984).  The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data.  Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495--517.

 

Bostwick, T., DeLucia-Waack, J. L., & Watson, D.  (1995).  Perceptions of dating behaviors and reasons offered to justify date rape.  NASPA Journal, 32(2), 123-129.

 

Bridges, J. S.  (1991).  Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs.  Sex Roles, 24(5/6), 291-307.

 

Brownmiller, S.  (1975).  Against our will: Men, women, and rape.  New York: Simon & Schuster.

 

Burgoon, J. K.  (1993).  Interpersonal expectancy, expectancy violation, and emotional communication.  Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30-48.

 

Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L.  (1988).  Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors.  Communication Monographs, 55(1), 58-77.

 

Byers, E. S., Giles, B. L., & Price, D. L.  (1987).  Definiteness and effectiveness of women’s responses to unwanted sexual advances: A laboratory investigation.  Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8(4), 321-338.

 

Byers, E. S., & Wilson, P.  (1985).  Accuracy of women’s expectations regarding men’s responses to refusals of sexual advances in dating situations.  International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 376-387.

 

Cassidy, L., & Hurrell, R. M.  (1995).  The influence of victim's attire on adolescents' judgments of date rape.  Adolescence, 30(118), 319-323.

 

Chapman, R. L.  (Ed.).  (1987).  American slang.  New York: Harper & Row.

 

Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M.  (1983).  Sex-role stereotyping and reactions to stranger versus acquaintance rape.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 344-356.

 

Clark, L., & Lewis, D.  (1977).  Rape: The price of coercive sexuality.  Toronto, Canada: Woman’s Press.

 

Cloven, D. H., & Roloff, M. E.  (1993).  The chilling effect of aggressive potential on the expression of complaints in intimate relationships.  Communication Monographs, 60(3), 199-219.

 

Crow, B. K.  (1998).  Conversational performance and the performance of conversation.  The Drama Review (TDR), 32(3), 25-54.

 

David, D. S., & Brannon, R.  (Eds.).  (1976).  The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role.  New York:  Random House.

 

Fichten, C. S., Tagalakis, V., Judd, D., Wright, J., & Amsel, R.  (1992).  Verbal and nonverbal communication cues in daily conversations and dating.  The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(6), 751-769.

 

Forsyth, D. R.  (1987).  Social psychology.  Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

 

Frith, H., & Kitzinger, C.  (1997).  Talk about sexual miscommunication.  Women's Studies International Forum, 20(4), 517-528.

 

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L.  (1967).  The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.  New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

 

Green, R.  (1988 [February]).  Psycho-educational modules.  In B. Schwartz, (Ed., with assistance from H. R. Celleni), A practitioner’s guide to treating the incarcerated sex offender: Breaking the cycle of abuse (pp. 95-100).  Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections.

 

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S.  (1981).  Effective evaluation.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

 

Heider, F.  (1958).  The psychology of interpersonal relations.  New York:  John Wiley & Sons.

 

Holcomb, D. R., Holcomb, L. C., Sondag, K. A., & Williams, N.  (1991).  Attitudes about date rape: Gender differences among college students.  College Student Journal, 25(4), 434-439.

 

Honigmann, J. J.  (1954).  An anthropological approach to sex.  Social Problems, 2(1), 7-16.

 

Jenkins, M. J., & Dambrot, F. H.  (1987).  The attribution of date rape: Observer’s attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation.  Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(10), 875-895.

 

Kanin, E. J.  (1984).  Date Rape: Unofficial criminals and victims.  Victimology, 9(95), 103.

 

Knodel, J.  (1993).  The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach.  In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35-50).  Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Kopper, B. A.  (1996).  Gender, gender identity, rape myth acceptance, and time of initial resistance on the perception of acquaintance rape blame and avoidability.  Sex Roles, 34(1/2), 81-93.

 

Korman, S. K.  (1983).  Nontraditional dating behavior: Date initiation and date expense-sharing among feminists and non-feminists.  Family Relations, 32(4), 575-581.

 

Koss, M. P.  (1989).  Hidden rape: Sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education.  In M. Pirog-Good & J. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships.  New York: Praeger.

 

Koss, M. P., Gidycz, , C. A., & Wisniewski, N.  (1987).  The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students.  Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 422-423.

 

Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J.  (1982).  Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.  Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 455-457.

 

Kowalski, R. M.  (1992).  Nonverbal behaviors and perceptions of sexual intentions: Effects of sexual connotativeness, verbal response, and rape outcome.  Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(4), 427-445.

 

LaPlante, M. N., McCormick, N., & Brannigan, G. G.  (1980).  Living the sexual script: College students’ views of influence in sexual encounters.  The Journal of Sex Research, 16(4), 338-355.

 

Lehne, G. K.  (1976).  Homophobia among men.  In D. S. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 66-88).  New York: Random House.

 

Lim, G. Y., & Roloff, M. E.  (1999).  Attributing sexual consent.  Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(1), 1-23.

 

Lindlof, T. R.  (1995).  Qualitative communication research methods.  Thousand Oaks, CA:  Sage.

 

Loven, J.  (2001, August 27).  One in 32 American adults are in corrections system.  The (Peoria, IL) Journal Star, p. A6.

 

Malamuth, N. M., & Brown, L. M.  (1994).  Sexually aggressive men’s perceptions of women’s communications: Testing three explanations.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 699-712.

 

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B.  (1995).  Designing qualitative research.  (2nd ed.).  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Marx, B. P., & Gross, A. M.  (1995).  Date rape: An analysis of two contextual variables.  Behavior Modification, 19(4), 451-463.

 

Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H.  (1996).  Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach.  In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 19 (pp. 49-91).  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

 

Metts, S., Cupach, W. R., & Imahori, T. T.  (1992).  Perceptions of sexual compliance-resisting messages in three types of cross-sex relationships.  Western Journal of Communication, 56(1), 1-17.

 

Miller, B., & Marshall, J. C.  (1987).  Coercive sex on the university campus.  Journal of College Student Personnel, 28(1), 38-47.

 

Missouri Sex Offenders Program [MoSOP].  (1998).  Definition of phases involved in a deviant cycle.  [Available from the Missouri State Office of Prisons.]

 

Mongeau, P. A., & Carey, C. M.  (1996).  Who’s wooing whom II? An experimental investigation of date-initiation and expectancy violation.  Western Journal of Communication, 60(3), 195-213.

 

Morgan, D. L.  (1988).  Focus groups as qualitative research.  Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Morgan, D. L.  (1993).  Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art.  Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Morgan, D. L.  (1997).  Focus groups as qualitative research.  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A.  (1993).  When to use focus groups and why.  In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3-19).  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Motley, M. T., & Reeder, H. M.  (1995).  Unwanted escalation of sexual intimacy: Male and female perceptions of connotations and relational consequences of resistance messages.  Communication Monographs, 62(4), 355-382.

 

Muehlenhard, C. L.  (1988).  Misinterpreted dating behaviors and the risk of date rape.  Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6(1), 20-37.

 

Muehlenhard, C. L., & Andrews, S. L.  (1985, November).  Open communication about sex: Will it reduce risk factors related to date rape?  Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Houston, TX.

 

Muehlenhard, C. L., Friedman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M.  (1985).  Is date rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men's attitudes toward women.  Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 297-310.

 

Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C.  (1988).  Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 872-879.

 

Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A.  (1987).  Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors.  Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(2), 186-196.

 

Osman, S. L., & Davis, C. M.  (1995).  Predicting men's perceptions of date rape using the hueristic-systematic model.  Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22(3), 25-32.

 

Pfeiffer, M.  (1990).  Date rape: The reality.  Southern University Law Review, 17, 283-295.

 

Pithers, W. D., Marques, J. K., Gibat, C. C., & Marlatt, G. A.  (1983).  Relapse prevention with sexual aggressives: A self-control model of treatment and maintenance of change.  In J. G. Greer and I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment (pp. 214-239).  New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

 

Rappaport, K., & Burkhart, B. R.  (1984).  Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males.  Archives of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216-221.

 

Regan, P. C.  (1997).  The impact of male sexual request style on perceptions of sexual interactions: The mediational role of beliefs about female sexual desire.  Basic And Applied Social Psychology, 19(4), 519-532.

 

Remick, L. A.  (1993).  Read her lips: Verbal consent to rape.  The University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141, 1103-1151.

 

Roth, S., Wayland, K., & Woolsey, M.  (1990).  Victimization history and victim-assailant relationship as factors in recovery from sexual assault.  Journal of Traumatic Stress, 3(1), 169-180.

 

Sawyer, R. G., Pinciaro, P. J., & Jessell, J. K.  (1998).  Effects of coercion and verbal consent on university students' perception of date rape.  American Journal of Health Behavior, 22(1), 46-53.

 

Schwartz, B.  (1988 [February]).  Interpersonal techniques in treating sex offenders.  In B. Schwartz, (Ed., with assistance from H. R. Celleni), A practitioner’s guide to treating the incarcerated sex offender: Breaking the cycle of abuse (pp. 101-107).  Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections.

 

Seidman, I. E.  (1991).  Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers and the social sciences.  New York: Teachers College Press.

 

Seligmann, J., Huck, J. Joseph, N., Namuth, T., Prout, L. R., Robinson, T. L., & McDaniel, A. L.  (1984, April 9).  The date who rapes.  Newsweek, pp. 91-92.

 

Shotland, R. L.  (1992).  A theory of the causes of courtship rape: Part 2.  Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 127-143.

 

Shotland, R. L., & Craig, J.  (1988).  Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior?  Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(1), 66-73.

 

Spitzberg, B. H.  (1998).  Sexual coercion in courtship relations.  In Brian H. Spitzberg and William R. Cupach, 1998, The dark side of close relationships (pp. 179-232).  Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Stevens, L. E., & DeLamarter, W. A.  (1991).  Evaluations of a date rape situation: Effects of victim's power strategy, rape outcome, and sex of subject.  (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 347 425).

 

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M.  (1990).  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.  Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H.  (1959/1969).  The social psychology of groups.  New York: John Wiley & Sons.

 

Thompson, S. M.  (1993).  No more fear: Sexual assault and the four “c’s” of rape avoidance.  (2nd Ed.).  Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

 

Thompson, S. M.  (1995).  Date/acquaintance rape: The crime and criminal profile.  Campus Law Enforcement Journal, 25(3), 21-22, 36.

 

Tucker, R. K., Weaver, II, R. L., & Berryman-Fink, C.  (1981).  Research in speech communication.  Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

 

Turner, L. H., & West, R.  (2002).  Perspectives on family communication.  (2nd Ed.).  Boston: McGraw Hill.

 

Walton, S. J.  (1994).  Date rape: New liability for colleges and universities.  NASPA Journal, 31(3), 195-200.

 

Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D.  (1967).  Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes.  New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

 

Weber, A. L., & Harvey, J. H.  (1994).  Perspectives on close relationships.  Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

 

Wight, D.  (1994).  Boys' thoughts and talk about sex in a working class locality of Glasgow.  Sociological Review, 42, 702-737.

 

Wilson, E. O.  (1976).  On human nature.  Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.