Forced Consent

 

 

On this page:

Sequential Context

Table of Contents

 

 

 

  Verbal Coercion

  • In a couple of date rape situations, the female victim gave verbal approval.  This was only after verbal and, in one case, potential physical coercion.  Even in those instances, the perpetrators gave evidence that the women were consenting begrudgingly and appeared passive throughout the sexual acts.  As Interviewee 10 described it:

She really liked me, but she didn’t really want to have sex.  And, it’s like “Well, why not?”  And she was like “We don’t know each other.”  And I told her “Don’t worry about that...  I live right here.  We can get to know each other.  I was continually messing with her mind.  I convinced her finally to have sex, after basically hounding her.  I was repeatedly asking for it.  She finally just basically broke down and said “Fine.”  She really didn’t get into it a whole lot....She was just more or less doing that so I would continue to be with her.  And, it lasted for a couple of weeks after that.  But, of course, I just moved on.

  • Besides providing an example of verbal coercion by this sex offender, the excerpt above demonstrates how his promise that “We can get to know each other” lacked sincerity, as Interviewee 10 admitted that after a brief time (i.e., two weeks) he “moved on.”  This is a glaring illustration of a tendency of the date rapists in my dissertation study, namely a lack of interest and/or commitment to long-term relationships with their female victims.

 

  Threat of Physical Coercion

  • Another date rapist, who was a notorious street gang member in both his and her neighborhood, recalled the sexual assault event with his female victim.  Interviewee 12 remarked:

Then, I’m like “Whoa, what’s up?  Do you want to do this or not?”  Said “I got protection.”  For a while, she didn’t say nothin’.  I was like “What’s up?  You gonna do it or what?”  She said, “I don’t care.”  So, I go ahead. . . . Her face was like ... now I can see that her face was like “No ... no.”  But, I know that I have no choice.

  • This date rapist relied on his “reputation of bein’ out there wild” in the local neighborhood, along with his aggressive language and vocal tone, to create fear in the female victim.  Interviewee 12 admitted to this approach and interpreted the connotations of language common within his and her neighborhood.  He explained:

It was like “What’s up?  Do you wanna do this or not?”  You know?  Well, on the streets, that’s like an aggressive way.  If I say “So what’s up? Do you wanna do this or not," it’s like “You’re gonna do this or else.”  Know what I mean?  People take it like that....That’s why she went ahead and went with all the sex things.

When discussing the victim’s involvement in sexual intercourse, the assailant recalled:

This girl didn’t do nuthin'.  Nuthin’.  She just laid there.  Like, “OK, if I touch him or something . . .”... It was like she was scared, you know?

  • Like all sex offenders profiled on this website, Interviewee 12 was indifferent to the emotional impact of the date rape event on his female victim.  His priority was to fulfill his sexual desires.  He did not for a moment consider the potential psychological or physical traumas the unwanted sexual act might inflict on the woman.

 

  "Consent"

  • As with the date rape incidents where there was verbal consent by the female victims, the women who provided nonverbal “consent” actually relinquished their own rights over their bodies because of verbal coercion from the sex offenders. 

  • This was evident in all of the following cases.  For instance, Interviewee 2 recalled the woman’s nonverbal approval of sex:  “That’s when she more or less said, ‘OK, I’ll lay my head down on the pillow.’  She didn’t say that.  She just did it.”  Due to the victim’s passive demeanor during sexual intercourse, the informant (Interviewee 2) acknowledged:

She didn’t come, and I didn’t come, and to achieve sexual orgasm, I might have had to keep her in bed by force.  I mean, just, you know, “OK, you’re going to lay here and we’re going to screw until I come.”  And that’s not something that I wanted to do.  It was obvious that she didn’t want to screw.  She didn’t want to have sex.

 

  Typically Lacked "Highly Forceful Physical Assault"

  • As seen in most of the date rape accounts, the sex offender never used highly forceful physical assault.  My impression was that this form of aggression would have had legal implications and would have created a negative self-esteem-related expectation where the man had to force the woman to have sex with him. 

  • Furthermore, I received the impression from date rapists in the study that they assumed their female victims would get into the romantic mood after the sex act proceeded.

Interviewee 2 remarked:  “I was hoping that she would...put some life into it.  And she disappointed me.  I thought, ‘Well, this girl is, she’s had a few drinks and she’s gonna enjoy this.  We’re going to have a good time.’”

Another perpetrator discussed a similar scenario.  Interviewee 11 recounted:

I put arms around her, touched her, began to kiss her, became more and more familiar and began touching her in sensitive areas like her breasts and stuff like that.  She attempted to get [me] to stop; she sort of pushed me back.  She accused me of "starting this again," and...she was correct.  So, at that point, I think to some degree, she gave in.  Finally, she just stopped grabbing at my hand and I just went ahead and undressed her.  And she just more or less went along with the program after that.

 

  Victim's Nonverbal Cues of Disapproval

  • This female victim was passive during sexual intercourse.  Her behavior was most likely intended as a form of nonverbal rejection, psychological withdrawal, or denial of the traumatic incident.  Interviewee 11 recalled: 

“Actually, she was almost motionless.  It was almost like undressing a mannequin.  She didn’t move....There was no assistance given whatsoever.  I’m unbuttoning everything.  I slipped her shoes off...the whole 9 yards.  She was virtually motionless.”

  • A final illustration of a female victim utilizing nonverbal cues to indicate disapproval of the perpetrator’s initiative to have sex was recounted by Interviewee 13, whose victim had stopped his advances firmly at least four previous times: 

“We started kissin' again; I started kissin' her again.  Laid back down on the couch.  Started rubbin' on her.  Well, she didn't stop me.  She finally gave in; we had sex.” 

In spite of all her rejections of the sex offender’s advances, this female victim was finally forced to succumb to his relentless pursuit.  The perpetrator added that the fact that he was the boyfriend of her closest friend left her depressed by what she thought was her betrayal of that friend. 

Interviewee 13 recalled his victim’s behavior in response to the situation.  He said she was: 

“Just staring off into space.  I asked her what was wrong, and she said ‘I can’t believe I did that.’  So, I think that was pretty much an indication that she was upset with herself.  She felt guilty.” 

This sex offender did not report to me that he experienced similar feelings of guilt for his unfaithfulness to his girlfriend.  Ironically, the person who should have been absolved from responsibility for the deceit was shackled with shame for having sex with her best friend’s dating partner.

 

  Common Phrase Patterns

  • There was an interesting pattern in the phrases of all date rapist comments cited in this section that related to the context in which victims agreed to have sex.  Juxtaposing the comments of interest illuminates the pattern:

That’s when she more or less said “Okay.” [Interviewee 2]

So, at that point, I think to some degree she gave in. [Interviewee 11]

She finally gave in; we had sex. [Interviewee 13]

  • I find the language, and the tentative quality of it, disturbing.  These sex offenders observed and reported their female victims to be half-hearted in their approval.  This is apparent with terms like, “more or less,” “to some degree,” and “finally.” 

  • Even more troubling are the terms, “Okay,” and “she gave in,” indicating a basic rejection to the sexual initiatives.  Only after undue and unwarranted pressure did female victims relent to the males’ self-centered demands for sexual satisfaction.  In these situations, the date rapist appeared to pursue his victim aggressively and relentlessly to the point of her physical exhaustion. 

  • His focus, strong will, and likely superior physical strength made this inevitable.  Once she was literally too exhausted to continue fighting, he interpreted her failure to actively protest as consent. 

  • In terms of the way he was likely socialized to adult life, he had just proven or reinforced his manhood.  The situation is not unlike that of a cat and mouse pursuit where the cat repeatedly pounces on the mouse until its sheer physical size and strength render the mouse exhausted.  In these date rape situations, the victim was worn down in the same manner.

 

Return to Research Findings