Perpetrators' Verbal Sexual Initiatives

 

 

On this page:

 

Sequential Context

Table of Contents

 

 

 

Perpetrators' Verbal Sexual Initiatives with Evidence of Thompson's Rape Sequence

  • Thompson (1995) claimed that all rapists follow a five-step pattern of behavior called “the rape sequence.” 

  • He further asserted that even though there are similarities among the ten different rapist personalities he identified, each personality type exhibits a similar behavior pattern. 

  • The rape sequence of a “nice guy,” that personality type women are generally more attracted to and likely to trust in a dating partner, is generally consistent and includes the following steps: 

1. Target Selection

2. Approach/Test

3. Sexual Violation

4. Intimidation

5. Termination (p. 22).

 

  Target Selection

  • Related to the "Target Selection" stage (step 1), the transcripts left me with the viewpoint that these perpetrators met their victims in typical surroundings (e.g., work, party, church, carnival, etc.). 

  • As I mentioned in the location section under situational context on the research findings page of the Web site, these situations were highly diverse, reflecting real world circumstances.

 

  Developing Trust

  • In the “Approach/Test” stage (step 2), there were several common methods used by the date rapists to develop trust.  For instance, Interviewee 10 described his gentlemanly manner:

[How did I develop] the trust?  The caring gestures--as far as, if she needed anything, I'd go up and get it for her.  The eye contact.  Making her think we were on the same level.  At first, I was real gentle, real caring.  And that just built up.

  • Interviewee 10 thought of himself as superior to the female; also, his statement suggested that the sham was only temporary. 

Another sex offender, Interviewee 7, profiled a similar style:

I was actin' like a gentleman.  I opened her car door (which I always do for a woman anyway), grabbed her hand, led her out from the car, and caught the door for her goin' into the buildin'.  Takin' her coat.

Interviewee 13 described his approach: 

“I was bein’ nice to her--like making her drinks, lighting her cigarette for her, sayin’ how pretty she was, making her feel like, not uncomfortable; making her feel not scared of what she was gonna do.” 

  • This man shared with us his desire to give the female victim a false sense of safety, of being “comfortable” and unsuspecting of his upcoming sexual advances.

Interviewee 3 stated:

I was really lyin’ to her and makin’ a fool over her, and being secretive toward her by tellin’ her, “I’m not like the other guys.  You need somebody to take care of you so you can stay home and work.  I’m not like the other guys, just wantin’ sex.”  You know what I’m sayin’--I was telling her things that I knew she wanted to hear, that might make her feel better about herself, to get her to trust me, to get her to know that “This guy ain’t like nobody else,” you know....Just to get her in my pocket, that was what I was tryin’ to do.

  • This disarming technique suggested wrongfully to the woman that the sexual assailant was different from males who desired only sex from females.

 

  Testing the Waters

  • After developing trust, these sex offenders used some sort of verbal or nonverbal communicative means to “test the waters.” 

Interviewee 9 discussed a common technique, namely sexual foreplay: 

“As she was driving and I was fondling her breasts and vagina, I thought she might say ‘Stop’ or something, but she didn't say nothing.  All she said was, ‘Not here; the kid's in the back [seat].’” 

Interviewee 10 recalled his “test:”

Oh, yeah; we were on the dance floor.  After we got close together, I was like, “Man, is that all you?”--talking about her breasts.  She said "Yeah.”  I’d kind of grab her breasts, and she’d laugh about it, at first.  I’m like, “Fine!”--thinking, “She’s letting me touch her breasts right here on the dance floor, so something’s right.”  So, it just progressed as far as hands on the butt.  Then, finally, when we got there, kissing in the back, I had my hand on her leg, and she didn’t mind that.  And I just slowly worked my way up, each time testing as I went....so I just proceeded to go all the way after that.

  • The importance of these “testing the waters” techniques to date rapists is that they help determine what will prompt female victims to reject their sexual advances. 

Interviewee 15 explained:

The foreplay just amounted to kissing.  And I played with her breasts, sucked on her nipples, arousing her.  That’s what the foreplay was about--to see the willingness, although I never doubted the willingness.  The way the situation arose, and who she said she had dated, indicated to me willingness.

  • Besides sexual foreplay to test the waters, Interviewee 15 named the importance of the context of the date (i.e., where he met the victim), and her disclosures about her previous dating partners, as perceived indicators of the woman’s willingness.  When I asked him to explain the comment about her previous male dates and their basic intent with women, Interviewee 15 said, "They was all town--there's no phrase you could use except 'low-life.'  And the only situation that I would see them dating her would be for sex...These guys were not for long-term relationships."

  • Unlike the aggressiveness shown by assailants described above, some sexual offenders utilized a less obtrusive manner to assess, as the previous informant termed it, “the victims’ willingness.” 

Interviewee 2 discussed his seemingly non-threatening initiative: 

When she took me in the bedroom to see pictures of her family displayed on the headboard of the bed, I sat down on the bed and took my shoes off and asked her if she wanted to snuggle.

 

  Sexual Violation

  • As Thompson (1995) indicated from his studies of date rape encounters, and as I also noted in interview transcripts, perpetrators tended to move their victims from public settings to more isolated surroundings. 

  • It is there that the sex offenders proceeded to the next step—Sexual Violation (step 3). 

 

  Communication Patterns

  • In reviewing verbal sexual initiatives, definable patterns emerged. 

    • For instance, a communication pattern expressed by one assailant, Interviewee 13, was the following:  “I told her, ‘I know you want me.’  And I told her, ‘You know I want you.’

  • "I remember saying that."  Interviewee 7 used similar language.  He commented to his victim:  “Well, I thought you wanted this like I did.”  In this statement, the date rapist was recalling his inference that both individuals “wanted” sex.

 

  • Another verbal communicative pattern was an assurance that allowing sexual intercourse to occur would have no undesired side effects. 

    • Interviewee 4 explained:  “I kind of was like, you know, ‘It will be all right.  There would be nothing wrong with it.’  I tried to persuade her.  Tried to talk her into it.” 

    • Interviewee 7 used the same strategy and language:  “I said, ‘Well, come on, baby.  You know it's going to be all right,’ you know?” 

    • The final example of this tactic revealed a variation.  Interviewee 16 said:  “I said, 'Just trust me.  Just trust me and relax and let it go.’” 

     

  • In these transcript excerpts, sexual offenders wanted the women to relinquish self-control based on some vague and unsubstantiated promise that the males’ sexual motive did not include any subsequent regrets for either the men or the women.

  • The final verbal communication pattern used by perpetrators as sexual initiatives were more threatening. 

  • Having already developed trust, “tested the waters,” and isolated their female victims, these sexual offenders reached an emotional and physical state where they did not intend to abandon their desires that had now evolved into demands for sexual intercourse. 

    • Interviewee 8 recollected:  [She said “No,” and] “I was like, ‘That ain't gonna work.’  I said, ‘Well, it's too late now,’ and went ahead.” 

    • Interviewee 7 expressed a similar sentiment:  “I said, ‘Come on, baby; you took me this far, you might as well go all the way.’”

     

  • Based on the two previous excerpts and the one that follows, one may ascertain a clear sense of the date rapists’ impatience with the victims’ hesitations about their sexual intent. Interviewee 18 recalled:

[I was] probably aggressive; most likely aggressive, saying, "Come on; let's do it."  I was a little mad.  That [was] a pretty long game of “hard-to-get.”  And I was gettin' peeved.  I figured, 'This far; might as well keep goin'.  And why's she being so cold about it?'

  • A final example of the perpetrators’ verbal sexual initiatives is the following.  Interviewee 16 remembered:

She said she was worried that Security would find us in the parking lot of the museum.  And I said, “Well, Security”--Well, really, I said, quote/unquote:  “Fuck Security.  Let's just get this over with.”  Afterward, I asked her, I said, “Are you all right?”  She said “No,” but told me to "just get it done; just get it over with."

  • All of the above verbal communication patterns cited from transcripts illustrate the date rapists’ increasingly more intense positive expectations related to the female victims’ being required to comply with the offenders’ sexual intent.

 

 

Return to Research Findings