Quick Links
Instructor Information
Office Hours
Laboratory Times
Course Objectives
To foster independence and critical thinking skills in the laboratory.
To foster an appreciation of chemistry as a physical science that is based on accurate, precise measurements and mathematical models.
To gain experience in preparing manuscripts for publication to the American Chemical Society’s standard.
Course Requirements
The Introduction is followed by a brief Experimental section. You should state where you got your materials, what instruments you used and what, if any, literature procedures you followed, but you should not give a step-by-step instructions on how you did everything. If you followed the given procedure exactly, say so, and reference the literature method. But if you changed the literature procedure, describe what was changed. If you substantially changed the procedure or came up with one of your own then write a new Experimental section.
The next section is the Results section where you describe your results in words (simply stating numbers is insufficient!) and any issues you encountered that might affect your final result. Include at least one example of each spectrum, kinetics run, graph, etc. that you obtained or made (if you must have all of them, put the others in Supplemental Material). The last section is the Discussion of Conclusions (click here for a description of what to include in this section, and some handy outlines, too). This section will be the longest, but still not more than four pages, or so. You may combine the Results and Discussion into a Results and Analysis section, if that allows you to present your results in a more meaningful way to the reader. For your references, be sure to follow the standard short ACS format (no titles in journal articles) and you must have a three references beyond what is given to you as a hardcopy or on the Physical Chemistry web page. At least one of these must be from the primary literature (i. e., not a textbook, instrument manual, or a compendium of information such as the Merck Index, the CRC or Wikipedia).
You are expected you to turn in at least two revised drafts of each report. You may ask other students or the Writing Center to read a draft of your report and the reader must sign and date their revised copy. Be considerate! When you ask someone to read your formal report, tell them the date that you will have the manuscript to them and then give them the final draft (with all figures and tables) on the arranged day!
You are expected to do a standard statistical analysis on your data and to perform a formal propagation of error analysis whenever possible (see the Data Analysis page on Chemlab to review statistical data treatment and propagation of error analysis). When a formal propagation of error analysis is not possible, quantitation of uncertainty and a discussion of its effect on the final calculated value is expected. If I don’t see evidence of people doing the statistical and propagation of error analyses, I will ask for these to be turned in with the formal reports.
Formal reports will be due in lab two weeks after the laboratory work is completed (see the class schedule for the exact dates). The last formal report will be due on your lab day during Finals Week.
Grading
I will assess each report using rubrics adapted from those found on the ChemLab web page. The point distribution for each exercise is given in the following table.
| Source | Points | |
| Attendance/promptness (10 points for each week in lab distributed as follows) | 30 | |
| Comes early | +5 | |
| On-time | +3 | |
| Late (or notebook not signed) | 0 | |
| Leaves by end of session | +5 | |
| < 5 minutes long | +3 | |
| 5 – 10 minutes long | +1 | |
| > 10 minutes long (or notebook not signed) | 0 | |
|
Laboratory citizenship (5 points for each week in lab) |
15 | |
| Outstanding (P+) | 5 | |
| Good (P) | 4 | |
| Iffy (~) | 3 | |
| Poor (P–) | 2 | |
| Very Poor (–) | 0 | |
|
Laboratory notebook (for each of statement of purpose, background and procedure) |
10 | |
| Outstanding (P+) | 4 | |
|
Good (P) |
3 | |
|
Iffy (~) |
2 | |
|
Poor (P–) |
1 | |
|
Missing (–) |
0 | |
| Format of formal report (all sections present, in proper order) | 5 | |
| Abstract | 5 | |
| Introduction | 10 | |
| Experimental | 5 | |
| Results | 10 | |
| Discussion of Conclusions | 15 | |
| Grammar/style | 10 | |
| Precision/accuracy of results (compared to literature values, which must be stated) | 10 | |
| Error analysis performed and used | 10 | |
| Rough and revised drafts of formal report (two or more) | 10 | |
| References (three beyond given, one primary) | 5 | |
| Three or more | +5 | |
| Two | +3 | |
| One | +1 | |
| None | 0 | |
|
|
Total |
150 |
| Grade | Total Points Earned | Cut-off |
| A | > 540 | average + 2s |
| B | 480 – 539 | average + s |
| C | 420 – 479 | average |
| D | 360 – 419 | average - s |
| F | < 360 |