Brief
Stage One—Non-Legal Version
Evaluation
|
Name |
|
Date |
|
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
10 |
|
Introduction |
|
|||
|
|
|
Is
the topic of the paper clearly identified? |
|||||
|
|
|
Is
the thesis clearly presented? |
|||||
|
|
|
Does
the writer preview the structure of the paper? |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
10 |
|
Organization |
||||
|
|
|
Is
the paper relatively easy to follow organizationally? |
|||||
|
|
|
Is
the paper free or unnecessary redundancies? |
|||||
|
|
|
Does
the writer provide signposts to guide the reader? |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
100 |
|
Content |
||||
|
|
|
Does
the author adequately identify and describe those responsible for decision
making on the issue? |
|||||
|
|
|
Does
the author identify and adequately describe the issues in dispute? |
|||||
|
|
|
Does
the author identify the potential weaknesses in the existing position? |
|||||
|
|
|
Does
the author offer a vision statement describing the possible consequences of a
change in the views of decision makers? |
|||||
|
|
|
Is
the vision statement appropriately adapted to the decision makers? |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
5 |
|
Review |
||||
|
|
|
Does
the writer tie the arguments of the paper together? |
|||||
|
|
|
Does
the writer remind us of the key claim of the project? |
|||||
Grade _____ out of 125 Deductions
- ________ ( _____ errors) Total |
|
||||||