If you argue for a universal artificial language, you may specify a currently known constructed language that you feel has particular advantages, or you may assume that someone will eventually succeed in constructing a language that meets all of Sapir's criteria.
If you argue against a universal artificial language, you should not cite the flaws of particular constructed languages, but show what problems would arise with any such language.
What would be the advantages/disadvantages of a naturally occurring human language fulfilling the function of a universal language? Why not English, for example?
Assuming that a fully developed artificial language greatly enhanced communication between humans (and/or aliens), are there any other functions of human language that an artificial language could not fulfill or would not fulfill as well as a naturally occurring language? If so, how would humans using an artificial language go about fulfilling those needs?


Back to The Languages of Science Fiction